Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: François Hartog argues that different social collectives experience historicity differently and advocates comparative study of different ‘regimes of historicity', different weightings of the relative importance of past, present and future. Drawing on my own and earlier ethnographies of southeast Solomon Islands, I contend that different regimes of historicity correlate with different ontologies discernible in different cosmogonic traditions. I developed this thesis in three parts. First, informed by classical scholarship that contextualizes Homeric tradition within an ancient Olympian cosmogony, I reanalyze Hartog's exegesis of Odysseus’s tears as a claim that Western historicity arose in tandem with a particular cosmogonic transition: the elimination of the demigods as a chaotic category in the monistic Olympian cosmos. Second, I re-examine origin stories in southeast Solomon Islands for what they indicate about poly-ontological (or totemic), as opposed to monistic, historicities. Whereas monistic ontologies entail single all-encompassing regimes of past-oriented historicity, poly-ontology, I argue, entails a plurality of past-oriented historicities, or poly-historicity. Third, in light of practices through which southeast Solomon Islanders have worked to keep ancestors active and available in a state of partial reversion to origins, I conclude that poly-historicity among pre-Christian southeast Solomon Islanders was composed as a plurality of what I theorize as reversive historicities.
Source: History and Anthropology
Author: Michael W. Scott
Institution: London School of Economics and Political Science
Language: English
Subfield: Geography, Planning and Development
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Awards: G509324953, G6727372792, G841499813
OpenAlex ID: W7164497523
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: