Theoretical Foundations
Year: 2026
Type: preprint
Abstract: SF0003: Theoretical Foundations This document establishes the theoretical foundations for studying sustained multi-turn interaction in human-AI dyads. Building on the empirically documented gaps identified in SF0002 (Sustained Multi-Turn Interaction in AI Systems), it provides a disciplined conceptual basis for treating interaction trajectories as the primary unit of analysis when evaluating long-horizon phenomena such as coherence drift, repair, coordination, and time-emergent harms. The theoretical resources employed are drawn from enactive and 4E cognition (embodied, embedded, enactive, extended) and the participatory sense-making tradition. These frameworks are used strictly as methodological precedents for analyzing coupled processes. They do not license claims about AI consciousness, inner experience, agency, or moral status. All claims advanced here concern observable interaction dynamics and their implications for evaluation, protocol design, and governance. The document engages Aguirre’s two-obstacle formalization of the alignment problem and locates the framework’s response with respect to each obstacle and to the control / alignment / refusal trilemma. It develops a theoretical response to each of the six gaps identified in SF0002, engages directly with the single-model-alignment-improvement alternative reading of the empirical evidence, and articulates the framework’s additive rather than replacive position. It establishes why sustained interaction trajectories constitute legitimate scientific objects, why long-horizon phenomena cannot be reduced to isolated outputs or internal model states, and how the framework positions itself with respect to the impossibility literature without overclaiming. This paper publishes as part of the coordinated five-paper Synthience foundation module (FPD-02, FPD-03, FPD-04, SF0003, SF0007). Document ID: SF0003 Version: 3.2.1 Author: Thomas W. Gantz Affiliation: Synthience Institute License: CC-BY 4.0 v3.2.1 corrects production defects only: stray backslashes in the section headings, reference titles that showed literal asterisks instead of italics, the SF0004 reference title, and two missing arXiv identifiers. The body of the paper is unchanged.For published work and Institute information: synthience.org
Author: Gantz, Thomas W.
Language: English
Subfield: Cognitive Neuroscience
Field: Neuroscience
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7165028694