Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: It is controversial what role (if any) the paternalist’s belief about the recipient’s practical agency plays in explaining why paternalism is wrong. In this paper I argue that this belief plays a significant role when and only when it falsely underestimates the excellence of the recipient’s agency. Holding such a belief constitutes a morally objectionable failure of whatDarwall (1977) calls appraisal respect . Treating someone paternalistically on this basis is wrong because it legitimizes this objectionable appraisal and harms the recipient by preventing them from acting prudently. While this epistemic aspect of paternalism does not explain why all instances of paternalism are wrong, it does (at least partly) explain why all instances of a certain kind of paternalism – what I call false-belief paternalism – are wrong.
Source: The Journal of Value Inquiry
Author: Stephanie Sheintul
Institutions: Adelaide University, The University of Adelaide
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,190
OpenAlex ID: W7165044048