Association of Fertility Preservation Benefit Mandates With Sperm Bank Network Adequacy: A Mixed-Methods Study
Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The effect of states mandating insurance coverage of fertility preservation for those facing iatrogenic infertility is unclear. We sought to qualitatively understand barriers to clinic acceptance of insurance coverage for sperm banking fertility preservation services and quantitatively estimate the association between mandated fertility benefits and clinics accepting insurance. METHODS: Staff at sperm banks in 3 mandate states completed in-depth interviews regarding patients accessing fertility preservation benefits through their insurance. Recruitment stopped at information saturation. Subsequently, a United States-wide secret shopper study was completed of andrology/fertility clinics evaluating acceptance of insurance for sperm freezing services and cash costs of services for a fictitious male patient with cancer. RESULTS: value = .0002). Only 37 (24.5%) of the clinics provided cash cost of sperm banking (ranging from $50 to $2000). CONCLUSIONS: The intent of fertility preservation mandates may be limited by barriers at insurer and clinic levels. Strategies to overcome barriers are needed to improve access to the full scope of fertility preservation benefits for male patients with cancer.
Source: Urology Practice
Language: English
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W7165899683
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: