Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: This study compares BIM-enabled electronic permitting and model/data checking across seven foreign cases (Singapore, Norway, Korea, Australia, Estonia, New Zealand, and the UK) using a three-layer framework: institutional design, operational practice, and technical implementation. Cross-case analysis identifies four implementation archetypes, ranging from mandatory IFC-based submissions with rule-based automated compliance checking to early-stage pilot programs. Based on the typology, we identify foundational conditions for institutional design: traceable submission management, automated data-quality validation at submission, and a clearly bounded scope of automation with defined accountability.
DOI: 10.3130/aija.91.1704
Authors: Jun OKOSHI, Mika NOGUCHI, Kazuya SHIDE
Institutions: Shibaura Institute of Technology, TODA Corporation (Japan)
Language: English
Subfield: Building and Construction
Field: Engineering
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W7166740002
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: