Work

A Competency Assessment Tool for Liver Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Development and Validation in a Large Multicenter Retrospective Cohort of Trainees (Preprint)

Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Background: Despite the increasing use of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), no standardized, organ-specific tool exists for assessing trainees' cognitive competency. Existing instruments lack multidimensional evaluation and external validation, which limit training quality and patient safety. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate the CEUS Competency Assessment for the Liver (CCAL), a tool to standardize the evaluation of theoretical and cognitive skills in liver CEUS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study had four stages: (1) item generation from literature and guidelines, (2) 3 Delphi rounds (12/21, 57.1% female experts; mean age 51.0, SD 7.2 y) and cognitive testing (10 trainees) for content validity (>85% agreement) and clarity, (3) internal validation involving 100 sonography trainees (n=66, 66% assistant professors; n=27, 27% associate professors; n=7, 7% professors; n=70, 70% CEUS-naive) with 1 month or more of training at 4 hospitals (2018-2020), and (4) external validation on 579 sonography trainees (n=299, 51.6% assistant professors; n=183, 31.6% associate professors; n=97, 16.8% professors; n=439, 75.8% CEUS-naive) with 1 or more months of training at 25 multicenter sites (2018-2020). Primary outcomes were reliability (Cronbach α and Guttman split-half) and validity (exploratory factor analysis and item discrimination), while secondary outcomes included item difficulty distribution, pass rates, and between-group differences. Results: =.001). Competency gaps were identified across specific competency domains: the pass rate ranged from 32.5% (188/579; image-guided intervention) to 81.3% (471/579; indications and contraindications). Conclusions: The CCAL is the first liver-specific CEUS competency tool integrating objective knowledge testing with structured self-evaluation. Unlike generic or simulation-based tests, it is organ-specific and validated across a large multicenter cohort, providing a multidimensional framework that identifies specific competency gaps, most notably in advanced image-guided procedures, beyond global pass/fail outcomes. The tool supports competency-based medical education through rigorous data-driven assessment, targeted curricular improvements, cross-institutional benchmarking, and informed training standards. It evaluates cognitive competence exclusively and should not replace procedural assessment in high-stakes decisions. International validation and the establishment of criterion-related and predictive validity are essential next steps.
Language: English
Subfield: Education
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $1,873
OpenAlex ID: W7166869060
FWCI:
Cites: 48
Cited by:
Related to: 10