Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: In what can be called the ‘logic of categorisation’, categories and their eligibility criteria are explained with the intent of preserving sport’s meritocratic ethos, justifying their conditions on a non-arbitrary, politically neutral basis. This paper argues that while such a logic succeeds in defending against charges of arbitrariness or prejudice, it does so at the cost of sidelining recognition. Through an analysis of the derivative values of fairness and inclusion, the paper reveals weaknesses in current attempts to affirm the dignity of categorised athletes. In response, the paper introduces for consideration the concept of contributive iteration. In doing so, the paper advocates for a pluralist, normatively substantive account of categorisation that promotes genuine recognition while broadening, rather than diminishing, the role of merit in sport.
Author: Jacob Giesbrecht
Institution: University of Stirling
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Reduced inequalities
Open Access status: hybrid
Funder: University of Stirling
OpenAlex ID: W7170080845