Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: ABSTRACT In this study, we evaluate Autometrics, an automated model selection method with controls for outliers and location shifts, against artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forests for six monthly energy price series (WTI, Brent, Dubai, US and Russian gas, Australian coal) from IMF data. Autometrics generally delivers lower RMSE/MAPE and higher directional accuracy than the ANN and random forest specifications considered here, particularly in the more volatile oil and coal markets. Autometrics also has the benefit of being interpretable in a familiar regression context as opposed to more “blackbox” machine learning. The CARDt method often delivers predictive accuracy which is not statistically different from Autometrics, but there is some evidence that simple model averaging of the two with intercept‐corrected Autometrics yields further gains relative to either alone.
Source: Journal of Forecasting
DOI: 10.1002/for.70239
Institutions: AspenTech (United States), Babson College
Language: English
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7171693400