Work

Soil Thermomagnetic-Fraction Geochemistry for Prioritizing Concealed Ni-Cu Sulfide Exploration Targets: A Case Study from the Jing’erquan Area, Beishan, NW China

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: Thermomagnetic-fraction geochemistry has shown promise beneath transported cover, but area-scale applications rarely combine explicit element-association analysis, statistical robustness tests and transparent target prioritization. We evaluate this workflow in the largely covered Jing’erquan Ni-Cu metallogenic area using 985 soil samples collected over approximately 140 km2 at an average spacing of about 300 m (7.0 samples km−2). After removal of pre-existing strongly magnetic grains, 100 g aliquots were heated under oxygen-limited conditions at 650 °C for 45 min, and the newly generated magnetic fraction was separated at an instrument-current setting of 1 A. Twelve indicators were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, hierarchical clustering, principal component analysis (PCA), spatial clustering and a three-term composite score. Four rotated factors explain 75.1% of the variance; Cr and Ni load at 0.95 on F2, while TFe2O3, Zn, Co and Cu covary on F1. Pearson–Spearman matrix agreement (r = 0.990), winsorized-versus-original Pearson agreement (r = 0.999), and PCA factor-congruence coefficients (>0.998) show that the principal associations are not controlled by the largest Cu, Ni or Cr values. Alternative composite weights retain all eight named follow-up targets, although internal ranking changes when Cu is emphasized. Among them, JQ-1–JQ-4 are assigned high follow-up priority by the expert-informed score. The coincidence of JQ-1 with the known Jing’erquan Ni-Cu mining area provides an internal plausibility check for the workflow, whereas JQ-2–JQ-8 remain unverified follow-up targets. These results show that the thermomagnetic-fraction dataset delineates multielement surface geochemical anomalies in covered terrain and can serve as a complementary screening tool for subsequent Ni-Cu exploration.

Source: Minerals

DOI: 10.3390/min16080852