Work

Portraying Mixed‐Agenda Couples: Insights From Large‐Scale Data Sets

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: This study investigates "mixed-agenda" couples characterized by significant discrepancies in commitment and therapy goals, using both clinical and non-clinical data sets. While theoretical frameworks suggest these couples present unique challenges for treatment planning and therapy outcomes, empirical data on their prevalence have remained limited. We analyzed data from the National Couples' Health and Time Study (NCHAT) and the Marriage and Family Therapy Practice Research Network (MFT-PRN) to identify groups of couples that might practically be classified as mixed-agenda couples. Findings reveal that mixed-agenda dynamics are prevalent, occurring in approximately 10% of the non-clinical sample and nearly 40% of the clinical sample. This exceeds prior clinical estimates and confirms that a substantial portion of couples seeking therapy do so with conflicting motivations. These results validate the mixed-agenda construct beyond anecdotal evidence, suggesting a need for tailored clinical interventions that address dyadic ambivalence to improve therapeutic efficacy and relationship stability.

Source: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

DOI: 10.1111/jmft.70165

Authors: Yike Tang, Shayne R. Anderson, Lee N. Johnson, Steven M. Harris, Anita Kateregga

Institutions: University of Minnesota, Brigham Young University

Language: English

Topic: Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Subfield: Clinical Psychology

Field: Psychology

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $3,010