Year: 2026
Type: book-chapter
Abstract: Understanding AI from the perspective of its criminal liability as a self-contained entity and at the same time establishing the persons who influenced their character by insinuating the idea of committing criminal acts, directly or indirectly, as an author, accomplice or instigator, can be a rather difficult objective to achieve.Due to the intelligence that characterizes AI, it is more like a natural person, so it should have the discernment of its actions, and it is interesting to establish how this can be determined.As a legal person, it cannot be framed in legal patterns because it does not meet the legal conditions for registration.Criminal liability involves conditioning a person who conflicts with the criminal law and sanctions should meet the educational purpose, if we look at AI from the perspective of a natural person.Not being a human being, it is difficult to assume that sanctions will achieve their goal.The concept of defendants entails a series of obligations that are not always specific to AI.And then it is difficult to imagine that you can oblige an entity without capital and without its own income to pay compensation.All these aspects must be correlated with the legal system harmed by AI.
Author: Adriana Iuliana Stancu
Institution: "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
OpenAlex ID: W7204147387