Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: Conner Schultz (Citation2025) has claimed that there are no normative reasons for the emotions, and perhaps not even for desire and preference. I will argue, in reply, that his argument for this claim fails, for we ought to distinguish two different constraints on normative reasons: the response constraint and the deliberative constraint. An upshot of my discussion is that our take on what normative reasons are affects our take on what there can be normative reasons for—a crucial observation, if we want to find a general theory of normative reasons.
Author: Roberto Keller
Institution: University of Geneva
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W7204279491