SPRINT: a structured pathway for real-world implementation
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: Background Getting evidence-based interventions and service innovations into routine practice remains one of the hardest problems in health and care. Practitioners tasked with leading change often lack a clear, sequenced approach that accounts for the realities of pressured services: limited staff capacity, competing priorities, and fragmented authority. We developed the SPRINT Implementation Pathway to address this gap. Methods SPRINT is a theory-informed, evidence-based implementation pathway that specifies what to do, in what order, and who needs to lead each piece of work. We applied process-tracing methods to qualitative evidence syntheses of high-quality international implementation studies informed by Normalisation Process Theory. We then examined how implementation strategies cluster and develop over time. We consolidated these into 22 general strategies organised within six sequenced stages of activity. Results SPRINT specifies three interlocking layers of implementation work. First, a practice bundle (the intervention components, interaction dynamics, rules and resources, and institutional logics) that must be stabilised before implementation can proceed. Second, six sequenced implementation activities , (mobilisation, fit-to-setting, staff participation, enabling action, learning and reconfiguration, and normalisation), operationalised through 22 strategies. Third, a leadership taxonomy distinguishing four forms of distributed leadership aligned to different implementation functions. Conclusion SPRINT reframes implementation as the sequence of work under pressure. By making authority, accountability, learning, and sustainment explicit, it provides a practical and disciplined pathway for implementing complex interventions in already pressured health and care settings. We demonstrate SPRINT across four contrasting cases: remote ventilation therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, psychosocial coaching for people living with HIV, treatment escalation planning at end of life, and orthopaedic teleconsultation. Finally, we provide a practical guide to SPRINT suitable for front-line health and care managers and practitioners.
Institutions: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, City St George's, University of London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Monash University, Trillium Health Centre, University of Sussex, University of Leeds, University of Sheffield, Freeman Hospital, University of Glasgow, Northumbria University, University of Birmingham, University College London
Language: English
Subfield: General Health Professions
Field: Health Professions
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,290
Awards: Delivering Effective Non-Invasive ventilation in Motor neuron disease using intensive remote support (DENIM), Care in Orthopaedics, burdeN of treatmeNt and the Effectiveness of Communication Technology: the CONNECT Project, G2695184213, A person-centred Needs Informed model of Care for people with HIV (NICHE), to improve wellbeing, mental health and reduce socio-economic disadvantages and stigma., G4308780141, EXPERTS II - How are patient and caregiver participation in health and social care shaped by experienced burden of treatment and social inequalities? A qualitative synthesis, G780076571
OpenAlex ID: W7204463821
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: