From Yellow to Revision: Deriving Three Evidence-Bounded Questions for a Universal-Use Prototype
Year: 2026
Type: other
Abstract: A Yellow review outcome makes uncertainty visible but does not by itself tell a claim-maker where to look next. This prototype methods paper develops a three-question revision checkpoint for the V6A evidence-trace workflow. The questions are derived from recurring practices across decipherment history, modern epigraphy, published specialist work, and separately identified expert communication. The paper treats Structural Fit, Cross-Case Fit, and Alternatives + Context as prototype revision principles to be tested rather than as universally validated laws. It also defines a small evaluation plan and preserves the rule that the original Yellow result remains in the record while any revised claim enters a new review cycle.
Author: Grasa, Michael
Institution: George Mason University
Language: English
Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
Funder: George Mason University
Award: G6997146537
OpenAlex ID: W7212396551
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: