Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: Pierre Bourdieu described sociology as a martial art but never specified what kind. The kind matters. The Japanese martial tradition offers a typology he did not draw: -jutsu, oriented toward defeating a real opponent; -do as competition, oriented toward internal scoring within a closed tournament; and -do as formation, oriented toward cultivating the practitioner rather than testing any claim against reality. I use this typology as a diagnostic framework. Sociology is predominantly -do. The costs are visible and cumulative, and they follow a pattern of slow response to external challenges: the credibility revolution, open science, and now AI. Open science and AI reshape what counts as rigorous work across methods, quantitative and qualitative alike. In 1853, Commodore Perry’s Black Ships arrived at Edo Bay, and the Shogunate discovered that two centuries of internal competition had not prepared it for an external force indifferent to its rules. The political order it had sustained did not survive the encounter. Sociology faces a comparable moment. I argue for a -jutsu imperative: not for any particular method, but for pressure-testing by standards the discipline does not control — a standard sociology has already committed to by claiming to produce knowledge about the social world, whether it acknowledges this or not.
Source: Theory and Society
Author: Torbjørn Skardhamar
Institution: University of Oslo
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,890
Funder: Universitetet i Oslo
OpenAlex ID: W7212619192