Work

Mutanome-guided immunopeptidomics of blood plasma for neoepitope detection in solid tumors is constrained by cfDNA variant calling sensitivity and MS detection limits

Year: 2026

Type: preprint

Abstract: Introduction Neoepitopes form the basis of tumor-specific immune responses. Tissue biopsy, the primary source for neoepitope detection, is limited and invasive. Therefore, we aimed to identify neoepitopes by mutanome-guided immunopeptidomics from plasma of cancer patients. Methods Mass spectrometry (MS) data analysis of HLA ligands from plasma (n = 4) was guided by patient-specific mutanomes of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma or tumor genomic DNA (tgDNA) from tissue. Matched tumor tissue and healthy donor plasma served as controls. Neoepitopes were validated with synthetic peptides, and immunogenicity was assessed using IFN-γ ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining. Results Wild-type immunopeptidomes from tissue and plasma overlapped by 58%, with 91% of plasma HLA ligands rediscovered in tissue. 13 out of 15 tumor-associated HLA ligands detected in plasma were rediscovered in the matching tissue. However, no neoepitopes in plasma were identified by immunopeptidomics guided by cfDNA mutanomes, likely reflecting the limited overlap between cfDNA and tgDNA mutanomes (15%). Using the tgDNA mutanome as a complementary reference, two neoepitopes were detected in one patient’s plasma, albeit at the MS detection limit. Both neoepitopes were also discovered in tissue, along with three tissue-exclusive neoepitopes. Two tissue-exclusive neoepitopes induced antigen-specific T cell responses in healthy donor PBMCs. Conclusion In summary, plasma immunopeptidomics enables profiling of HLA ligands from wild-type proteins, including TAAs. In principle, neoepitope detection from plasma at the peptide level is feasible, but tissue remains the gold standard for variant calling and neoepitope identification. Improved detection methods may enable minimally invasive approaches in the future.

Source: bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

DOI: 10.64898/2026.09.21.753080