The Nutrition Facts of Comfort Foods in the United States: Results from the Census-Matched Eating in America Study
Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Background/Objectives: Comfort foods are perceived as energy dense and highly palatable, yet little empirical research documenting the veracity of such perceptions exists. Methods: We analyzed comfort foods for nutrient content, hyperpalatability, ultra-processing, and by demographic factors, hypothesizing poor nutritional profiles (higher fat, sugar, sodium, ultra-processing) and demographic differences in preferences. US census-matched respondents (N = 1760) self-identifying as comfort eaters listed their top three “comfort foods” through an online survey assessing comfort eating behavior and demographics (age, gender, US residence region). Trained raters abstracted nutrient contents for nominated foods using public reference databases and compared them against established nutritional recommendations (percent daily values [%DV]). We categorized foods by hyperpalatability and Nova classifications. Summary statistics were calculated overall and by demographic group. Two-sample t- and one-way ANOVA tests evaluated nutritional and demographic group differences. Results: N = 300 unique foods/beverages were nominated as top comfort foods, collapsible into n = 132 groupings by similarity (e.g., in ingredients, preparation). The top five groupings were chips, ice cream, pizza, chocolate, and cookies. Notable proportions of comfort foods were low (<5%DV) sources of fiber (60.7%), high (>20% DV) sources of saturated fat (29.7%) and sodium (31.7%), hyperpalatable (72.7%) (especially of the “meats/meal” variety (54.3%)), and 100% ultra-processed (42.7%). Slight differences (p < 0.05) in preferred foods’ nutrient content, hyperpalatability, and ultra-processing by age, gender, and region emerged. Conclusions: US comfort foods range widely but converge on certain foods. Nutritional quality could broadly improve; demographic differences are minor. These findings enhance the practical understanding of comfort food nutrition and inform efforts towards healthier comfort food selection.
Source: Nutrients
DOI: 10.3390/nu18193257
Language: English
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,499
Funders: National Science Foundation, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, National Institutes of Health, University of California, San Francisco, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Awards: Obesity stigma and health behavior: An experimental approach, Food Insecurity, Poor Diet, and Metabolic Syndrome: Cortisol’s Amplifying Role, Comfort eating in the Eating in America Study: New insights to inform prevention and intervention efforts across the lifespan, Training Researchers in Clinical Integrative Medicine (TRIM), Collaborative Research: Testing the Stress-related Cyclical Nature of Metacognitive Sensitivity to Financial Standing
OpenAlex ID: W7216290627
