Get started
Work

La actualidad de la agresión y la necesidad de discutir la aplicación diferenciada del derecho internacional humanitario

Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: This article explores the differentiated application of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in case of aggression. It points to the gravity of the aggression and the centrality of its prohibition in contemporary international law as the basis for differentiated application and the breach of the principle of equality of belligerents. Since one of them—the aggressor—commits a serious violation of a peremptory norm of international law (jus cogens), claiming that IHL should recognize the belligerents as equals in this case would jeopardize the position of the prohibition of aggression within the legal order: the aggressor could attempt to use IHL norms to consolidate the legal effects of its aggression, in clear violation of jus cogens and the hierarchy it implies in international law. At the same time, the article indicates the limits of differentiated application, which are restricted to the rights and advantages that IHL recognizes for States, and in no way affect the rights of protected persons or the obligations of States—both belligerents and third parties—towards them. It is argued that differentiated application is limited to preventing the aggressor from invoking rights or advantages under IHL that would allow it to consolidate its aggression, but does not legitimize any violation of the victim's obligations. The article examines three issues within IHL that give rise to arguments in favor of differentiated application: the aggressor's inability to invoke military necessity as an exception; the modification of the aggressor's rights and obligations in the case of occupation; and the aggressor's responsibility for the deaths of enemy combatants.
Language: Spanish
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W7220326495
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: