Work

MRI-Based Prediction of Immunotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Year: 2026

Type: review

Abstract: Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to improve long term outcomes and pathological complete response (pCR) rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, treatment response remains heterogeneous. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a promising noninvasive biomarker for predicting response to immunotherapy-containing treatment regimens. Purpose: To systematically review studies evaluating MRI biomarkers for predicting response to immunotherapy-containing treatment regimens in breast cancer. Methods: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of PubMed was performed for studies published between June 2019 and June 2026 evaluating MRI-based prediction of pCR or immunotherapy response in breast cancer. Data regarding study design, MRI techniques, predictive performance, and study characteristics were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. Results: Across the ten included studies, conventional MRI generally demonstrated moderate predictive performance (AUC 0.65–0.75), whereas multiparametric radiomics models achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC up to 0.88). Several consistent themes emerged. Studies evaluating neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) reported increased MRI-pathology discordance and reduced reliability of enhancement-based assessment alone, suggesting that conventional MRI response assessment may require refinement in this treatment setting. Functional MRI biomarkers, including diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic enhancement metrics, identified treatment response earlier than baseline morphologic imaging, while radiomics models integrating MRI with clinical or molecular biomarkers consistently demonstrated the strongest predictive performance. However, evidence remained limited by heterogeneous imaging protocols, small study populations, and limited external validation. Conclusions: MRI, particularly multiparametric and radiomics-enhanced approaches, is evolving beyond conventional morphologic assessment to provide complementary information regarding tumor biology and treatment response in patients undergoing NACI. However, standardized imaging protocols and prospective multicenter validation are needed before MRI-derived biomarkers can be incorporated into routine clinical decision-making.

Source: Cancers

DOI: 10.3390/cancers18203267

Authors: Juhi Mehta, Cassidy Adams, Christian Sellers, Kevin E. Duong, Takouhie Maldjian

Institutions: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Meharry Medical College

Language: English

Topic: MRI in cancer diagnosis

Subfield: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Field: Medicine

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $3,499