Slower growth, indoor environmental enrichment, or covered veranda access: A comparison of three rearing systems for broiler chicken welfare and behavior
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: The use of slower-growing chicken strains and environmental enrichments are major levers for improving broiler welfare. This study compared the effects of three rearing systems on the welfare and behavior of broiler chickens: intermediate-growing broilers (Redbro) kept in an unenriched environment ("RDB"), fast-growing broilers (Ross 308) kept in a highly enriched and complex indoor environment ("RoE+"), and fast-growing broilers (Ross 308) having access to a 36-m² covered veranda from D14 ("RoCV"). Each of the four 81-m² pens per treatment housed 1,350 birds until they reached a final body weight of 1.9 kg, corresponding to a final indoor stocking density of 30 kg/m². As they aged, the RoCV chickens increasingly went into the covered verandas until an average of 27% of the birds in the verandas was reached on D32. At the same time, RoE+ broilers perched more and more on the enrichments over time. RoE+ birds consumed more water than RoCV chickens from D24 onward, without any difference in feed consumption. RDB and RoCV birds had fewer leg lesions than RoE+ ones, although the litter quality did not differ between the treatments, but RDB birds had better gait scores than either RoE+ or RoCV broilers. More walking, running, foraging, sparring and frolicking behaviors were observed in the covered verandas than in the indoor pens, where resting behavior was more frequently observed. RoE+ birds dustbathed more often than RDB and RoCV chickens. No difference between treatments was found for mortality. Fewer RoCV broilers reached the different steps of the detour test and approached a novel object than RDB and RoE+ broilers. Overall, the three rearing systems compared influenced different aspects of broiler welfare: RDB treatment was associated with better walking ability and fewer occurrences of footpad dermatitis, RoE+ with more comfort behaviors, and RoCV with more active behaviors and improved footpad condition.
Source: Poultry Science
Institutions: Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail, Université de Tours, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Biologie des oiseaux et aviculture
Language: English
Subfield: Animal Science and Zoology
Domain: Life Sciences
SDG: Zero hunger
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,600
OpenAlex ID: W7221475561
