Evaluation of early C‐reactive protein kinetics as an early response marker in biliary tract cancer treated with combined chemoimmunotherapy: A multicenter observational study
Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Reliable prognostic biomarkers for treatment response in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) who receive chemoimmunotherapy are still lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of early C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics as a tool for predicting survival in these patients. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed patients with BTC who received chemoimmunotherapy at eight tertiary centers and evaluated CRP kinetic models with regard of their prognostic ability within the first 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) differed according to CRP dynamics. The median PFS was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI], not reached to not reached) for patients with consistently normal CRP, 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.7-15.3 months) for those with initially normal CRP, 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.6-8.4 months) for those with subsequent CRP normalization, and 2.0 months (95% CI, 0.9-3.1 months) for those with persistently elevated CRP. The corresponding median OS was not reached (95% CI, not reached to not reached) for patients with consistently normal CRP, 26 months (95% CI,15.5-36.5 months) for those with initially normal CRP, 23 months (95% CI, 12.0-34.0 months) for those with subsequent normalization, and 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.3-11.7 months) for those with persistently elevated CRP (PFS, log-rank p < .001; OS, p = .005). The overall response rates were 50%, 33.3%, 36.0%, and 21.2%, respectively. The prognostic performance of this model remained stable when subgroup definitions were based on 6-week cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS: CRP kinetics may be a valuable prognostic tool for early response assessment in patients with BTC who receive chemoimmunotherapy. However, these findings require prospective external validation in larger cohorts.
Source: Cancer
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.70644
Authors: Gabriel Allo, Joshua Leutiger, Catherine Leyh, Christian Möhring, Ann‐Kristin Zöller, Vera Himmelsbach, Gianluca Ciarlo, Maryam Barsch, Christoph Neumann‐Haefelin, Bertram Bengsch, Fabian Finkelmeier, Mohamad Murad, Cennet Sahin, Marie‐Luise Berres, Maria A. Gonzalez‐Carmona, Christoph Roderburg, Arndt Weinmann, Anna Saborowski, Arndt Vogel, Dirk Waldschmidt
Institutions: University Hospital Cologne, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, University Hospital Bonn, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Medical Center Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, FH Aachen, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Language: English
Subfield: Surgery
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $4,790
OpenAlex ID: W7221785943