Work

CALLY is not associated with colorectal polyps risk: a systematic evaluation and mechanism exploration controlling for traditional factors and Traditional Chinese Medicine constitution

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: Background: Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most common malignancy in terms of incidence. Colorectal polyps (CP) are the most common precancerous lesions of CRC, making the timely identification of their risk factors critically important. Although the CALLY index has theoretical promise as a tool for stratifying the risk of CP occurrence, its clinical utility remains unvalidated and warrants rigorous empirical assessment. Traditional risk factor models primarily focus on measurable biological indicators, often overlooking differences in an individual's overall functional state. Incorporating traditional Chinese medicine constitution (TCMC) is expected to enable the development of more comprehensive risk prediction models. Therefore, this study aims to validate whether CALLY is an independent risk factor for CP and to conduct preliminary exploration of its potential biological mechanisms, based on systematic control of traditional medical risk factors and TCMC. Methods: This study is a retrospective cross-sectional study that enrolled 452 hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy between October and December 2025. By constructing a stepwise-adjusted logistic regression model, conducting interaction analyses, testing mediating effects, and performing sensitivity analyses, we systematically investigated the relationship between CALLY and CP and its potential mechanisms. Results: -values for direct, indirect, and total effects all > 0.05). Conclusions: Among hospitalized gastroenterology patients, CALLY is not an independent risk marker for CP and is not recommended as a routine screening indicator for this population for the time being. Risk assessment for such patients should focus on their gender, age, diabetes and gastric polyps. The phlegm-dampness constitution should be considered a preliminary finding due to the small subgroup size and wide confidence intervals; its role as a stable risk factor requires independent validation in larger prospective cohorts.

Source: Frontiers in Public Health

DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1953202

Authors: Kui Zhang, Xiaokun Wu, Fang Lin, Boyuan Chen, Yubin Han

Institutions: Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan Hospital of TCM

Language: English

Topic: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Subfield: Oncology

Field: Medicine

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $3,801