Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: Online adjudication is often analysed through contrasts between physical and remote participation, or through the coexistence of online and offline modes. This article examines a more granular institutional transformation: how procedural rules make components of the adjudicative encounter separately configurable while preserving their legal continuity. Using a theory-informed socio-legal documentary analysis of Chinese online-litigation rules from 2018–2022, the article identifies three linked patterns: regulated separability across participants and procedural stages; bounded temporal separability for selected activities; and selective institutional reconstitution through authentication, spatial and role qualification, procedural classification, and common records. These findings support the concept of the modularisation of adjudicative space. Modularisation is distinguished from hybridity and procedural-justice evaluation: it identifies the rule-governed relationship between procedural differentiation and institutional continuity. China is used as a theory-revealing institutional case, not as a universal model of digital justice.
Source: Oñati Socio-legal Series
Author: Lingxiang Chen
Institution: Liaoning University
Topic: Education, Law, and Society
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W7223175017