Neonatal Resuscitation Training in Australian Public Birthing and Newborn Care Facilities: A National Cross-Sectional Survey
Year: 2026
Type: preprint
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Background: The stabilisation of infants at birth is vital for survival and relies on clinicians being appropriately trained in neonatal resuscitation. The effectiveness of resuscitation is influenced by the skills, knowledge and equipment available to the responding clinician. In Australia, the absence of a standardised neonatal resuscitation training programme may contribute to variations in training practices. This study aimed to describe current training practices across Australian public services and explore educators perceptions of opportunities for national standardisation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to educators and representatives from birth and newborn care public facilities across Australia. A questionnaire was developed to gain knowledge on how newborn resuscitation is taught detailing staffing, equipment and training requirements. Results: 197 completed responses were received. Responses were received from all Australian states and territories and levels of maternity/neonatal services. Accreditation in neonatal resuscitation was required by 173 (87.8%) of respondents programmes with training occurring at annual (n=95, 47.7%) or more frequent (n=21, 10.7%) intervals. NeoResus (n=134, 67.5%), Neonatal Advanced Life Support (n=45, 22.8%) and Newborn Life Support Training (n=41, 21.3%) were the most popular training programmes. Substantial variation was identified in equipment used for training. Most respondents (n=174, 88.3%) reported a need for a standardised national training programme. Conclusions: Neonatal resuscitation training is widely available in Australian public facilities, but reported requirements, programmes, content, assessment methods and training resources vary. These findings support the development of standardised neonatal resuscitation training to promote consistent preparedness across Australian healthcare settings.
Source: medRxiv
Language: English
Subfield: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7223260894
