Work

Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work?

Year: 2013

Type: article

Abstract: What is the role of expertise in evaluating creative products? Novices and experts do not assess creativity similarly, indicating domain-specific knowledge's role in judging creativity. We describe two studies that examined how quasi-experts (people who have more experience in a domain than novices but also lack recognized standing as experts) compared to novices and experts in rating creative work. In Study One, we compared different types of quasi-experts with novices and experts in rating short stories. In Study Two, we compared experts, quasi-experts, and novices in evaluating an engineering product (a mousetrap design). Quasi-experts (regardless of type) seemed to be appropriate raters for short stories, yet results were mixed for the engineer quasi-experts. Some domains may require more expertise than others to properly evaluate creative work.

Source: Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts

DOI: 10.1037/a0034809

Authors: James C. Kaufman, John Baer, David H. Cropley, Roni Reiter-Palmon, Sarah Sinnett

Institutions: University of Connecticut, Rider University, University of South Australia, University of Nebraska at Omaha

Language: English

Topic: Creativity in Education and Neuroscience

Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Field: Psychology

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: green

OpenAlex ID: W2129863227

FWCI: 9.81

Cites: 62

Cited by: 223

Related to: 10