Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: A stop command ends a process, not what the process set in motion. Before it stops, an AI agent can issue a credential, queue an instruction, schedule a job or delegate work. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for judging whether that retired authority can still produce a protected business effect. Business-impact analysis defines the effect first, and reconciled evidence and negative tests then challenge the routes. A surviving route is FAIL. Unresolved state, attribution or timing is INCONCLUSIVE. Adequate evidence over a justified window supports a bounded PASS. The cutoff is the accepted stop demand, so later containment does not erase a late accepted effect. Independent authorization needs its own assessment. All three outcomes enter a scenario-conditioned loss interval, shown with three constructed payment cases and an OpenAI sandbox incident (scope errors only). The contribution is a decision framework. No implementation, detection gain or reviewer validation is claimed.
Source: Acta Innovations
Institution: Vels University
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W7223935778