Work

Deep learning reveals severe shelterbelt degradation in eastern Ukraine due to the war

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has caused extensive damage to forests, particularly in eastern and southern regions with sustained combat, where field shelterbelts have often been used as cover and subsequently heavily destroyed. This study presents a systematic region-scale assessment of pre-war shelterbelt area and war-related loss between 2021 and 2025 using 3 m PlanetScope imagery and deep learning. We evaluated three input datasets—monthly PlanetScope RGB mosaics, multiseasonal PlanetScope RGB stacks, and surface reflectance (SR) PlanetScope imagery—in combination with two semantic segmentation architectures: a convolutional U-Net with a ResNet-34 encoder and a transformer-based SegFormer with a MiT-B0 backbone. Across all input configurations, the U-Net consistently outperformed SegFormer, achieving the highest F 1 scores. Monthly RGB mosaics delivered accuracy comparable to more complex multiseasonal and SR inputs in pixel-based evaluation and are a cost-efficient option for mapping narrow shelterbelts. The RGB-based model trained on July 2021 mosaics reached an F 1 score of 0.71 and retained values of 0.58–0.67 for other months of the same leaf-on season. Temporal transfer to 2025 resulted in lower but still reasonable performance with F 1 scores of 0.53–0.63. Error-adjusted mapping estimated the shelterbelt area in 2021 at 254 ± 14.5 thousand ha, equivalent to a mean density of 2.6 ha km −2 . By 2025, this area had been reduced by approximately 41 thousand ha, or 16% of the pre-war area. Losses were strongly concentrated along frontlines where local losses exceeded 1.5 ha km −2 compared to an average loss of 0.5 ha km −2 across the entire study area. The resulting maps complement the existing forest monitoring framework in Ukraine and provide a spatially explicit basis for prioritizing post-war remediation and assessing losses in protective functions and carbon accumulation.

Source: Environmental Research Letters

DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aebaa1