Work

A Comparative Benchmark of Modern Deep Learning Backbones for Multi-Class Periodontal Bone Loss Staging

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: Background/Objectives: Early diagnosis of periodontal disease is critical to prevent tissue destruction and tooth loss. This study evaluates six modern deep learning architectures for four-class radiographic periodontal bone loss grading on panoramic radiographs. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1053 images. Two periodontologists independently classified each image according to the most severely affected tooth into four bone loss categories: Healthy, Mild (<25%), Moderate (25–50%), and Severe (>50%). Six convolutional, transformer, and hybrid backbones (ConvNeXt-Tiny, MaxViT-Tiny, EfficientViT-B1, FocalNet-Tiny, CAFormer-S18, and DaViT-Tiny) were trained on a 70/10/20 stratified split using an NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPU, the AdamW optimizer, Cosine Annealing, and early stopping. Performance was assessed using standard classification metrics, Matthews Correlation Coefficient, Cohen’s and Quadratic Weighted Kappa, Expected Calibration Error, Area Under the Curve (AUC), McNemar’s test, and bootstrap 95% confidence intervals. Results: FocalNet-Tiny achieved the highest numerical scores among the tested models, reaching 83.41% accuracy, 84.70% balanced accuracy, 83.50% macro-F1, and 0.9610 OvR AUC. The p-values obtained from the comparisons of the models were all above 0.05, indicating that the classification performances of the evaluated models are quite similar. Bootstrap analysis confirmed stable prediction metrics for the top-scoring model. Conclusions: This study provides a controlled benchmark of modern deep learning backbones for four-class radiographic periodontal bone loss grading. FocalNet-Tiny achieved the highest numerical metrics and stable bootstrap estimates, yet performed comparably to other contemporary architectures such as ConvNeXt-Tiny. Direct radiographic classification shows promise for automated radiographic pre-screening; however, multi-center external validation and integration with clinical periodontal parameters are required before clinical implementation.

Source: Journal of Clinical Medicine

DOI: 10.3390/jcm15218644