The Dual-Channel Annihilation Field Model: Onion Structure of Ordinary Quantum Wells and the Onion-Peeling Mechanism at the Black Hole Center
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: The Dual-Channel Annihilation Field Model: Onion Structure of Ordinary Quantum Wells and the Onion-Peeling Mechanism at the Black Hole Center Author: Weihui Lu 202611 Corresponding author: Lu Weihui Email: [email protected] ORCID: 0009-0002-9230-9525 Abstract This paper organizes the terminology of the Dual-Channel Annihilation Field Model and establishes the asymmetric enclosure relations of the onion structure in ordinary quantum wells: the external repulsion of a negative quantum well can be screened by enclosure within a positive quantum well, whereas the gravity of a positive quantum well cannot be screened by enclosure and can only be cancelled by an equally exposed negative quantum well. Electrons and positrons assume a symmetric half-enclosure state, in which the positive and negative quantum wells are each half-exposed and neither completely encloses the other. On this basis, the onion structure of ordinary quantum wells is extended to the black hole center, and an onion-peeling mechanism for singularity disappearance is proposed: positive quantum well layers are peeled off layer by layer under high pressure, negative quantum well layers are exposed layer by layer and provide back-pressure, and the outer positive quantum well layers together with the external creation system press back, triggering the next peeling. Each peeling corresponds to a local pressure release and re-equilibration, so that a global zero-scale singularity has no opportunity to form, and a finite-scale self-stabilizing structure of alternating layers is finally reached. The mechanism rests on the three asymmetric rules of the onion structure in ordinary quantum wells and does not rely on the static fine-tuning of “exactly equal positive and negative forces.” The term “onion peeling” used here is only a figurative expression for the nested quantum-well structure and differs from existing onion-like black hole models in both the physical identity of the shells and the peeling mechanism. 1. Terminology The objects of the model are organized in three tiers. The definitions below are taken from the published manuscripts; no new terms are coined. 1.1 Tier 1: Well-type frameworks (empty state, inert) Positive and negative quantum wells: Potential-carrying structures that may be occupied by the corresponding annihilation pairs. A positive quantum well carries positive annihilation pairs; a negative quantum well carries negative annihilation pairs. In the empty state they contain no annihilation pairs and participate in no reactions. The “quantum well” here is an excitation mode of the annihilation field (i.e., of spacetime itself), not the quantum well of semiconductor heterostructures; the two merely share a name. Empty quantum well (neutral quantum well): A third kind of well that may exist between positive quantum wells or between negative quantum wells. It is not that no annihilation-pair reactions occur there; rather, equal amounts of positive and negative reactions are separated within the same well and their effects neutralize each other, so that the well appears externally as “empty” or “neutral.” A single quantum well may itself possess a nested structure (wells within wells), and its interior may be partitioned, so that the same well may be “half” positive and “half” negative. The empty quantum well has been incorporated into the postulate system and stands on an equal footing with positive and negative quantum wells. Anti-well-type structure: Refers only to the structural oppositeness exhibited in the arrangement of two quantum wells that both carry annihilation pairs; it is not an independently existing empty-well carrying state. A single anti-well does not exist; no anti-well structure exists within an empty quantum well. 1.2 Tier 2: Excited states (well + annihilation pair, reacting) Positive quantum well + positive annihilation pair → ordinary matter. Positive quantum well + positive annihilation pair in antiparticle phase → positive-energy antimatter. Negative quantum well + negative annihilation pair → negative-energy matter. The “annihilation pair” must be defined strictly according to the four statements of the original text: First, it is a form of reaction, not a fixed particle pair. Second, it is the most fundamental reaction at the cosmic底层 level. Third, it is a controlled annihilation reaction: it does not reach complete annihilation but returns—the reaction retreats after reaching a certain limit, forming a reciprocation of annihilation and recurrence rather than a one-time, total disappearance. Fourth, its form is not fixed and varies with the topological structure of the quantum well. What standard physics calls matter–antimatter annihilation is only the manifestation of this underlying “annihilation pair” reaction under specific conditions. 1.3 Tier 3: Reaction products Bright solitons in the positive channel, the negative-channel tension field, redshift effects, gravitational clustering near strong centres, etc. 1.4 Mandatory distinction The “annihilation pair” of this model is a controlled sub-threshold reaction that returns before complete annihilation; it is not the standard process in which an electron and a positron meet and their rest mass is entirely converted into radiation. The reaction–diffusion equations describe excited-state densities only, not the empty well frameworks themselves. 2. Onion Structure of Ordinary Quantum Wells An ordinary quantum well may possess an onion structure, meaning a layered enclosure or symmetric juxtaposition of positive and negative quantum wells. This structure is not an anti-well-type structure; a single anti-well still does not exist. The enclosure relations of the onion structure are asymmetric and are stated in three rules. 2.1 Rule 1: When a negative quantum well is enclosed by a positive quantum well, the external repulsion of the negative quantum well disappears The negative annihilation pairs still exist, but the negative quantum well no longer exhibits external repulsion and is in an enclosed state. The external resistance of the negative quantum well can be screened by enclosure within the positive quantum well. 2.2 Rule 2: The gravity of a positive quantum well is not screened by enclosure The gravitational property of a positive quantum well differs from the external repulsion of a negative quantum well: gravity is penetrating. Even if the positive quantum well is enclosed by a negative quantum well, its gravity still penetrates outward and does not disappear because of the enclosure. Enclosure by a negative quantum well cannot screen the gravity of a positive quantum well. 2.3 Rule 3: Cancelling the gravity of a positive quantum well requires an equally exposed negative quantum well Since the gravity of a positive quantum well penetrates enclosure and is not screened, cancelling this gravity requires a negative quantum well exposed to an equal degree, providing the corresponding back-reaction. When the negative quantum well is enclosed, even its external repulsion has disappeared, let alone any cancellation of the positive well's gravity. The gravity of a positive quantum well cannot be removed by a negative well “yielding” while enclosed; the negative well must be exposed to the same degree as the positive well. 2.4 Symmetric half-enclosure state and the structures of electrons and positrons In the symmetric half-enclosure state, the positive and negative quantum wells are half and half, and neither completely encloses the other. Macroscopically the interaction is neutral—neither attractive nor repulsive—but the well contains positive and negative annihilation pairs and should therefore possess mass and inertia. How inertia is to be defined remains unclear and is left as an open question. Enclosure form of the positron: The positron requires the negative quantum well to have an exposed position; the positive quantum well must not completely enclose it. The positive well cannot fully enclose the negative well and must leave a face on which the negative well is exposed; only then does the positron structure hold. Enclosure form of the electron: The electron is symmetric to the positron. The outer negative quantum well must leave an exposed position for the electron; the negative well must not completely enclose the positive well. The positive and negative wells are each half-exposed, and neither completely encloses the other. No global rotation in the neutral region: The neutral quantum well region described above cannot form a direction of rotation. The overall inertial mass is considerable, rotation is unnecessary and does no work; if it rotated globally, the constancy of the speed of light could not be defined. No global rotation of neutral quantum wells has been observed—that is, no global rotation of the vacuum has been observed. 2.5 Summary of enclosure relations The external repulsion of a negative quantum well can be screened by enclosure within a positive quantum well; the gravity of a positive quantum well cannot be screened by enclosure and can only be cancelled by an equally exposed negative quantum well. The two properties are asymmetric: one is screenable, the other is not. Electrons and positrons assume a symmetric half-enclosure state, with the positive and negative wells each half-exposed and neither completely enclosing the other; the macroscopic interaction is neutral, but mass and inertia are retained. 3. Onion-Peeling Mechanism at the Black Hole Center 3.0 Definition of “onion peeling” The term “onion peeling” used in this paper is only a figurative expression for the nested quantum-well structure (alternating layers of positive and negative quantum wells with empty quantum wells filling the interstices) undergoing layer-by-layer peeling under critical compression. This structure differs from the Planckonion (Planck-scale density shells), quasicrystal recursive shell
Author: lu, weihui
Language: English
Subfield: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Field: Physics and Astronomy
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7225831221
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: