Key-elements of family interventions for psychosis : a qualitative research
Year: 2014
Type: dissertation
Abstract: Psychotic-spectrum disorders are complex biopsychosocial conditions and family issues are important determinants of prognosis. The discovery of the influence of expressed emotion on the course of schizophrenia paved the road to the development of family interventions aiming to lower the “emotional temperature” in the family. These treatment approaches became widely recognised. Effectiveness studies showed remarkable and strong results in relapse prevention and these interventions were generalised to other psychotic disorders besides schizophrenia. Family interventions for psychosis (FIP) prospered and were included in the most important treatment guidelines. However, there was little knowledge about the process of FIP. Different FIP approaches all led to similar outcomes. This intriguing fact caught the attention of authors and attempts were made to identify the key-elements of FIP. Notwithstanding, these efforts were mainly based on experts’ opinions and the conclusions were scanty. Therefore, the knowledge about the process of FIP remains unclear. Aims: To find out which are the key-elements of FIP based on empirical data. Methods: Qualitative research. Three studies were conducted to explore the process of FIP and isolate variables that allowed the identification of the key-elements of FIP. Study 1 consisted of a systematic literature review of studies evaluating process-related variables of FIP. Study 2 subjected the intervention records of a formerly conducted effective clinical trial of FIP to a qualitative analysis. Records were analysed into categories and the emerging data were explored using descriptive statistics and generalised estimating equations. Study 3 consisted of a narrative evaluation using an inductive qualitative approach, examining the same data of Study 2. Emotional markers and markers of change were identified in the records and the content of these excerpts was synthesised and discussed. Results: On Study 1, searches revealed 733 results and 22 papers were included in the qualitative synthesis. We found a single study comprehensively exploring the process of FIP. All other studies focused on particular aspects of the process-related variables. The key-elements of FIP seemed to be the so-called “common therapeutic factors”, followed by education about the illness and coping skills training. Other elements were also identified, as the majority of studies evidenced a multiple array of components. Study 2,revealed as the most used strategies in the intervention programme we analysed: the addressing of needs; sharing; coping skills and advice; emotional support; dealing with overinvolvement; and reframing relatives’ views about patients’ behaviours. Patterns of the usefulness of the strategies throughout the intervention programme were identified and differences between high expressed emotion and low expressed emotion relatives were elucidated. Study 3 accumulated evidence that relatives experience different emotions during group sessions, ranging from anger to grief, and later on, to acceptance and positive feelings. Discussion: Study 1 suggested a stepped model of intervention according to the needs of the families. It also revealed a gap in qualitative research of FIP. Study 2 demonstrated that therapists of the trial under analysis often created opportunities for relatives to express and share their concerns throughout the entire treatment programme. The use of this strategy was immediately followed by coping skills enhancement, advice and emotional support. Strategies aiming to deal with overinvolvement may also occur early in the treatment programme. Reframing was the next most used strategy, followed by dealing with anger, conflict and rejection. This middle and later work seems to operate in lowering criticism and hostility, while the former seems to diminish overinvolvement. Single-family sessions may be used to augment the work developed in the relatives groups. Study 3 revealed a missing part of Study 2. It demonstrated that the process of FIP promotes emotional changes in the relatives and therapists must be sensitive to the emotional pathway of each participant in the group.
Author: Jaime Grácio
Language: English
Subfield: Clinical Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W778240237