Year: 2008
Type: dissertation
Abstract: This work intends to discuss about the theory of social change.Habermas in Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus analyses that the theory of social change should serve as a basis for the formulation of a society theory.The linkage of these two theories at the beginning of the 1970 guides for the placement of two other important theories: the theory of communicative action and the theory of modernity.In a first time explores the construction of the theory of society as checking Habermas recasts the assumptions of the Critical Theory, entered an evolutionary basis with emancipator claims.In a second time discusses the structure of the theory of social change in the texts of the decade of 1970, mainly for the Reconstruction of Historic Materialism, highlighting the problem of homology between ontogeny and philogenesis and attempts to equate Habermas in individual and society through of three paths: the formation of the post-conventional identity, the extent practical-moral and capacity to learn.In a third time, there is a capacity for learning as the only way that keeps open the possibility of the relationship ontofhilogenesis and only alternative that Habermas has standing to maintain his theory of social change in the Theory of Communicative Action.In this work, there is, above all, the displacement of psychology of development for the incorporation of authors linked to sociology, particularly Mead and Durkheim, targeting the stability of the relationship as an ontofhilogenesis point for the maintenance of the theory of social change and, consequently, own critical social theory Habermas inscribed on the paradigm of communication.
Author: Clodomiro Jose Bannwart Junior
Language: Portuguese
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
OpenAlex ID: W984705728