Get started
Author

Daniel W. Hopper

Observed names: D.W. Hopper, Daniel Hopper, Daniel W Hopper, Hopper, Daniel
Observed institution: University of Nevada, Reno
OpenAlex ID: A5084918463
Proteomic analysis indicates massive changes in metabolism prior to the inhibition of growth and photosynthesis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to water deficit
2013 · Grant R Cramer, Steve C Van Sluyter, et al. · BMC Plant Biology · 143
PDF
Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Daniel W. Hopper, Ryan Ghan, et al. · BMC Plant Biology · 71
PDF
A rapid dehydration leaf assay reveals stomatal response differences in grapevine genotypes
2014 · Daniel W Hopper, Ryan Ghan, et al. · Horticulture Research · 62
PDF
Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ryan Ghan, Steven C. Van Sluyter, et al. · BMC Genomics · 53
PDF
Early and late responses of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) to water deficit: a proteomics perspective
2017 · G.R. Cramer, D.W. Hopper, et al. · Acta Horticulturae · 1
Additional file 5: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Daniel Hopper, Ryan Ghan, et al.
Additional file 5: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 4: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 8: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 6: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 7: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 3: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 2: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 1: of Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance
2016 · Hopper, Daniel, Ghan, Ryan, et al. · Figshare
Dehydration response of different grapevine genotypes and organs
2015 · Daniel Hopper
Additional file 5: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Sluyter, Steven Van, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 6: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Sluyter, Steven Van, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 3: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Sluyter, Steven Van, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 8: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Sluyter, Steven Van, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 4: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Sluyter, Steven Van, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 7: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Sluyter, Steven Van, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 9: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Sluyter, Steven Van, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 1: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Van Sluyter, Steven, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 10: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Van Sluyter, Steven, et al. · Figshare
Additional file 2: of Five omic technologies are concordant in differentiating the biochemical characteristics of the berries of five grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars
2015 · Ghan, Ryan, Van Sluyter, Steven, et al. · Figshare
Works count: 32
Citation count: 330
H-index: 4
I10-index: 4
Year
Topic
Type