Keyword

reporting quality

Description: The degree to which research reports provide complete, accurate, transparent, and methodologically appropriate accounts of studies.

Primary topic: Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (39%)

OpenAlex ID: keywords/reporting-quality

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

2009 · D. Moher, A. Liberati, et al. · BMJ · 83,802

PDF

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

2009 · David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, et al. · PubMed · 44,857

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

2018 · Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie, et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 43,118

PDF

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 · David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 37,545

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

2009 · Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman, et al. · PLoS Medicine · 28,087

PDF

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies

2007 · Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, et al. · PLoS Medicine · 22,867

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

2007 · Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, et al. · The Lancet · 20,966

PDF

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2009 · David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 19,573

PDF

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies

2007 · Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 17,719

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

2008 · Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 17,679

PDF

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

2009 · A. Liberati, D. G Altman, et al. · BMJ · 17,618

PDF

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

2010 · David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, et al. · International Journal of Surgery · 12,137

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

2007 · Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, et al. · BMJ · 10,679

PDF

The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education

2017 · Keith S. Taber · Research in Science Education · 10,647

PDF

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

2009 · Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman, et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 10,566

Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

2014 · T. C. Hoffmann, P. P. Glasziou, et al. · BMJ · 10,496

PDF

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

2009 · Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman, et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 10,345

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies

2014 · Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, et al. · International Journal of Surgery · 9,854

CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

2010 · D. Moher, S. Hopewell, et al. · BMJ · 8,870

PDF

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration

2007 · Jan P Vandenbroucke, Erik von Elm, et al. · PLoS Medicine · 8,575

The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

1998 · S H Downs, N Black · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 8,246

PDF

Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

2004 · Gunther Eysenbach · Journal of Medical Internet Research · 6,428

PDF

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement

2015 · Eric I. Benchimol, Liam Smeeth, et al. · PLoS Medicine · 5,646

PDF

Empirical Evidence of Bias

1995 · Kenneth F. Schulz · JAMA · 5,634

The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines

2020 · Riaz A. Agha, Thomas Franchi, et al. · International Journal of Surgery · 5,593

PDF

Works count: 15,930

Citation count: 937,300