Suit and Settlement vs. Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Costs
Year: 1981
Type: report
Abstract: Will a party who believes that he has a legally admissible claim for money damages decide to bring suit?if so, will he subsequently settle with the opposing party or will he go ahead to trial?These questions are analyzed under four methods for allocating legal costs, namely, under the American yem, whereby each side bears its own costs; under the "indemnity" or British yem, whereby the losing side bears all costs; under the ytem favoring the whereby the plaintiff pays only his own costs if he loses and nothing otherwise; and under the ystem favor the defendant, whereby the defendant pays only his own costs if he loses and nothing otherwise.Following the analysis, two brief illustrations are considered and comments are made on the relative social desirability of the methods of allocating legal costs.
DOI: 10.3386/w0662
Author: Steven Shavell
Institutions: National Bureau of Economic Research, Harvard University
Language: English
Subfield: Economics and Econometrics
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
Funder: National Science Foundation
OpenAlex ID: W2003018692