Autonomia do crime de lavagem e prova indiciária
Year: 2008
Type: article
Abstract: Resumo Traca breves consideracoes sobre o principio da autonomia do crime de lavagem em relacao ao crime antecedente e sobre a prova de ambos os crimes. Analisa a questao da prova indiciaria a luz do Direito comparado, mediante a jurisprudencia das cortes federais norte-americanas e do Supremo Tribunal espanhol, e afirma que a jurisprudencia dos tribunais de apelacao brasileiros ainda nao e significativa a esse respeito. Alega que a admissao da validade da prova indireta para caracterizar o crime de lavagem nao implica o enfraquecimento das garantias do acusado no processo penal, pois tal prova devera ser convincente “acima de qualquer duvida razoavel”. PALAVRAS-CHAVES Direito Penal; Direito comparado; lavagem de dinheiro; crime antecedente; autonomia; prova indiciaria; Lei n. 9.613/98 – art. 2o. Abstract The author outlines brief comments on the autonomy of the money laundering crime in relation to the precedent crime and on the evidence of both crimes. He assesses the issue of circumstancial evidence in the light of Comparative Law, through the case law of North-American federal courts and that of the Spanish Supreme Court, considering that the Brazilian appeal courts jurisprudence on this issue is still lacking. He claims that admission of indirect evidence to suggest the crime of laundering does not lead to the undermining of the accused’s rights within the criminal proceeding, since such evidence should be convincing “beyond any reasonable doubt”. KEYWORDS Criminal Law; Comparative Law; money laundering; precedent crime; autonomy; circumstancial evidence; Law No. 9,613/98 – article 2nd.
Source: Americanae (AECID Library)
Author: Sérgio Fernando Moro
Language: Portuguese
Topic: Criminal Law and Policy
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2210344121