Year: 2016
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: Many foreign scholars studied for the definition of the crisis.Rosenthal, who believe that the crisis is the basic mechanism of a framework and code of conduct of a serious threat to the social system, and the event at extremely high pressures and uncertainty in the event of the case must be made key decisions.Barton believes that the crisis will cause a potential negative impact of having a large event of uncertainty, such events and their possible consequences for the organization and its staff, products, services, assets and reputation cause some damage.We will find the blank of the literature, and will prepare for further research. Study on Public Crisis ManagementGreen said: crisis management feature is the "event has grown to the extent that cannot control," he claimed: "Once the crisis, the time factor is critical to reduce the loss will be an important task."Pointed out the harm crises, run away and time urgency, he believes that the crisis management task is to try to control the situation in the crisis of the loss of control in a certain range, after the situation out of control again to fight for control.Charles Herman believes that the crisis is a situation state, the fundamental objective of its decision-making body is threatened, before the decision to change the available reaction time is limited, and other decision-making body is also expected.Chun yu Miao Ling analysis and research before the Great Hanshin Earthquake, the Japanese government's crisis management under the influence of the entire administrative system, legal regulations is relatively mature, but the lack of a rapid response mechanism and unified coordination mechanism, management system construction is lagging behind, causing the Japanese government in the Great Hanshin earthquake failed to play a leading role in the criticism of public opinion.As a lesson and an opportunity to adjust the rights of the Government of Japan to configure relations crisis management, to break the limitations of longitudinal administrative structure, increase the intensity of the crisis management system construction, and achieved remarkable results.For public crisis management researchers from more practical point of view, the results of a comprehensive researchers, defined as: "the power of the relevant governmental organizations in monitoring, early warning, intervention or control, digestion generate, process and influence the evolution of the crisis taken a series of methods and measures.Crisis is evolving, public crisis management is a dynamic process.Addis Ping believes that it comprises before, during, and afterwards, after four stages of crisis management [1].The Federal Security Management Committee on Prevention (Prevention), preparation (PreParation), reaction (Response) and recovery (Recovery) that is based PPRR on corrected to slowing (Mitigation), prevention (preparation), the reaction (Response) and recovery (Recovery).Robert Heath proposed 4R model: reduction (Reduction), preparation (Readdiness), reaction (Response), recovery (Recovery) [2].Many domestic scholars from different perspectives put forward the idea to build public crisis management system.Wang Le fu etc. to "atypical pneumonia" for example, describes an effective crisis management mechanism should include the following aspects: (1) to establish an effective early warning mechanism; (2) the establishment of effective internal coordination mechanisms; (3)
Author: Jiemin Huang
Institution: Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
OpenAlex ID: W2382997541