Tularemia vaccine: Safety, reactogenicity, “Take” skin reactions, and antibody responses following vaccination with a new lot of the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain – A phase 2 randomized clinical Trial
Year: 2017
Type: article
Study designs: Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Tularemia is caused by Francisella tularensis, a gram-negative bacterium that has been weaponized as an aerosol. For protection of personnel conducting biodefense research, the United States Army required clinical evaluation of a new lot of tularemia live vaccine strain manufactured in accordance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices. METHODS: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial compared the new lot (DVC-LVS) to the existing vaccine that has been in use for decades (USAMRIID-LVS). The vaccines were delivered by scarification to 228 participants. Safety, reactogenicity, take and/or antibody levels were assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 8, 14, 28, 56, and 180. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: Both vaccines were safe and had acceptable reactogenicity profiles during six months of follow-up. There were no serious or grade 3 and 4 laboratory adverse events. Moderate systemic reactogenicity (mostly headache or feeling tired) was reported by ∼23% of participants receiving either vaccine. Injection site reactogenicity was mostly mild itchiness and pain. The frequencies of vaccine take skin reactions were 73% (95% CI, 64, 81) for DVC-LVS and 80% (95% CI, 71, 87) for USAMRIID-LVS. The 90% CI for the difference in proportions was -6.9% (-16.4, 2.6). The rates of seroconversion measured by microagglutination assay on days 28 or 56 were 94% (95% CI, 88, 98; n=98/104) for DVC-LVS and 94% (95% CI, 87, 97; n=103/110) for USAMRIID-LVS (p=1.00). Day 14 sera revealed more rapid seroconversion for DVC-LVS relative to USAMRIID-LVS: 82% (95% CI, 73, 89) versus 55% (95% CI, 45, 65), respectively (p<0.0001). MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The DVC-LVS vaccine had similar safety, reactogenicity, take and antibody responses compared to the older USAMRIID vaccine, and was superior for early (day 14) antibody production. Vaccination take was not a sensitive surrogate for seroconversion in a multi-center study where personnel at five research clinics performed assessments. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01150695.
Source: Vaccine
Authors: Mark J. Mulligan, Jack T. Stapleton, Wendy A. Keitel, Sharon E. Frey, Wilbur H. Chen, Nadine Rouphael, Srilatha Edupuganti, Allison Beck, Patricia L. Winokur, Hana M. El Sahly, Shital M. Patel, Robert L. Atmar, Irene Graham, Edwin Anderson, Samer S. El-Kamary, Marcela F. Pasetti, Marcelo B. Sztein, Heather Hill, Johannes B. Goll
Language: English
Subfield: Molecular Biology
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,620
Awards: G2079557966, G2122243961, G2342806175, G255603196, G2693928168, G2803504785, G3283725566, Clinical Research Career Development (RMI), G4302167702, G4747567267, G4756288451, G4845630206, G5389918357, Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) Renewal, G6528419944, G6766413353, G7005057852, G7204274223, G7227179786, G7253274711, G7635746006, G7958424035, The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Award, G8029648735, G8856756599, G891096689
OpenAlex ID: W2736787461
