Year: 2018
Type: article
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Working Group 5 was assigned the task to review the current knowledge in the area of digital technologies. Focused questions on accuracy of linear measurements when using CBCT, digital vs. conventional implant planning, using digital vs. conventional impressions and assessing the accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) and patient-related outcome measurements when using s-CAIS were addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature was systematically searched, and in total, 232 articles were selected and critically reviewed following PRISMA guidelines. Four systematic reviews were produced in the four subject areas and amply discussed in the group. After emendation, they were presented to the plenary where after further modification, they were accepted. RESULTS: Static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), in terms of pain & discomfort, economics and intraoperative complications, is beneficial compared with conventional implant surgery. When using s-CAIS in partially edentulous cases, a higher level of accuracy can be achieved when compared to fully edentulous cases. When using an intraoral scanner in edentulous cases, the results are dependent on the protocol that has been followed. The accuracy of measurements on CBCT scans is software dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Because the precision intraoral scans and of measurements on CBCT scans and is not high enough to allow for the required accuracy, s-CAIS should be considered as an additional tool for comprehensive diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgical procedures. Flapless s-CAIS can lead to implant placement outside of the zone of keratinized mucosa and thus must be executed with utmost care.
Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13309
Authors: Daniel Wismeijer, Tim Joda, Tabea Flügge, George Fokas, Ali Tahmaseb, Diego Bechelli, Lauren Bohner, Michael Bornstein, Allan Burgoyne, Santiago Caram, Robert Carmichael, Chun‐Yung Chen, Wim Coucke, Wiebe Derksen, Nikos Donos, Karim El Kholy, Christopher Evans, Vincent Fehmer, Stefan Fickl, Guliano Fragola, Beatriz Gimenez Gonzales, Hadi Gholami, Dena Hashim, Yu Hui, Ali Kökat, Konstantinos Vazouras, Sebastian Kühl, Alejandro Lanis, Richard Leesungbok, Joerd van der Meer, Zhonghao Liu, Takahiro Sato, Andre De Souza, William C. Scarfe, Mauro Tosta, Paul van Zyl, Kirstin Vach, Vida Vaughn, Milan Vucetic, Ping Wang, Bo Wen, Vivian Wu
Institutions: Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Bern, University of Freiburg, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Hong Kong, National University of Rosario, Universidade de São Paulo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, University of Toronto, University of Liège, Queen Mary University of London, Harvard University, University of Geneva, Michigan State University, University of Belgrade, Okan University, Tufts University, University of Basel, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Kyung Hee University, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, University of Groningen, Binzhou Medical University, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, University of Louisville, Peking University
Language: English
Subfield: Oral Surgery
Field: Dentistry
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $5,170
OpenAlex ID: W2895818263