May be influenced by practice specific factors
Year: 1995
Type: letter
Abstract: recommend, as S Field and colleagues do in their editorial,2 that two views should be taken instead of one and that the screening interval should be reduced from three to two years, without even considering the possible adverse effects of repeated exposure to low doses of ionising radiation,3 strikes me as foolhardy.
Source: BMJ
Author: Vivien Hollyoak
Institution: Durham County Department of Public Health
Language: English
Topic: Radiation Dose and Imaging
Subfield: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W296809733