Year: 2021
Type: review
Abstract: Sustainability of mining projects is linked to informed investment decisions based on public reporting of exploration and mineral resource estimation results. In Australia, guidelines for public reporting are established by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee reporting code through the JORC Code (2012). Although assessment of uncertainty in the results reported is a requirement, this is often communicated in a qualitative manner and subjectively evaluated. This can become a liability if not communicated effectively, particularly in early stages of mining projects when spatial domains of geological interpretation and mineralization envelopes influence reliability of resource estimates. This review describes methodologies for quantitative uncertainty assessment and communication, and explores how they could be applied in public reporting practice. The complexity, cost and additional work of doing a quantitative assessment could hinder a straightforward implementation. This could be overcome if mining companies budget for quantitative uncertainty assessment and associated professional development. A compulsory requirement for inclusion of uncertainty assessments in public reporting or use of standardized subjective language would improve industry practice.
Source: Ore Geology Reviews
Institutions: Charles Sturt University, WA Country Health Service
Language: English
Subfield: Geology
Field: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,120
Funder: Australian Government
OpenAlex ID: W3133812948