Year: 2021
Type: article
Abstract: Aim This audit aims to compare Core Surgical Training (CST) rotas in our region against the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) Quality Indicator (QI) 10’s minimum standard of 5 consultant supervised training sessions per week. Method Core surgical trainees in one training region were contacted requesting their on-call rotas from rotations undertaken during the 2019/20 academic year. Rotas were analysed in a protocolised manner, with the number of potential training sessions available calculated and compared against the JCST QI 10 minimum recommendation. Results Twenty-four rotas were assessed across 17 hospitals. Only six (25%) rotas achieved the JCST QI 10 recommended minimum 5 training sessions per week. There was a mean deficit of 18.5 (+/-29.5) training sessions per 6-month rotation. Rotas compliant with JCST QI 10 used a mean rota pattern of 1 in 11 compared to 1 in 9 for those failing to meet the target. Sub-analysis, comprising of the addition of expected consultant supervised training whilst on call, led to an improvement in compliance. 9 (38%) rotas met JCST QI 10's minimum standard when 0.5 hours of consultant supervised training time per on-call session was included, and 13 (54%) rotas met the standard when 1 hour was included. Conclusions Core surgical trainee rotas in the region are failing to provide the minimum number of consultant supervised training sessions set out by JCST QI 10. A move to reduced on-call commitment, increased use of supporting medical practitioners and regular perceived consultant supervised training whilst on call should be considered to improve this.
Source: British journal of surgery
Authors: B Chandrasekar, R Leatherby, A Kausar, A Waghorn
Language: English
Subfield: Education
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W3205344869