Work

A Philippine case study of conflicting models in mass communication education.

Year: 2010
Type: article
Abstract: Development is one international media model that has been touted as an alternative and perhaps reaction to the traditional Western model that most often assumes private or corporate ownership and is primarily supported by advertising. Reporters, editors and broadcasters adhering to the Western model can be expected to endorse some degree of objectivity that assumes their job is to present the facts and to let the reader, listener or viewer reach his or her own conclusions and interpretations of the news and information they are providing. News is thus viewed as a commodity and beyond the idealism of working journalists. A primary goal of news production and dissemination is marketing and profits. 'A field of communication as a field of study and practice is journalism. This new genre of is about reporting and interpreting the news from a perspective. It refers to both the contents of (development) and the process of reporting, which is different from traditional, or conventional, journalism.' That the Western model continues to dominate worldwide and to be recognised by the United Nations as the primary model to be propagated in developing countries is evidenced by the 2007 UNESCO model curricula, which fails to mention or any other alternative models in defending and advocating for the new Western-based model they propose. By this omission of a discussion of alternative and interventionist press models, it is apparent that UNESCO is an unreserved advocate for the Western model, although developing nations such as the Philippines are determined, as this study suggests, to explore and support alternative models such as as a tool for nation building and mobilising the population to achieve and economic well-being. Despite high idealism and intensive promotion by its designers and advocates, the communication model has yet to prove successful at winning widespread endorsement by working journalists in either developed or underdeveloped nations that usually command the largest audiences. Development communication has in some cases been imposed on professional journalists with backgrounds in relatively independent commercial media. Once they become accustomed and proficient regarding Western news conventions and newsroom culture, they are likely to resent conceding the kind of professional empowerment, independence and sense of control of the news and information they gather. In the past, initiatives for the promotion of have tended to be top-down and often clumsy in implementation. The model suffers from the fact that its origins are in universities or foundations, rather than in newsrooms or professional journalistic organisations. Perhaps because of the intransigence of Philippine journalists to adopt journalism, supporters of the model in Philippine communication programmes are moving away from promoting it as a substitute for the Western model. Rather they are focusing on training communicators for careers outside of professional and commercial journalism, and concentrate on the model's roots in agricultural extension and other forms of non-profit communication. Still contemporary communication students show a propensity to see their communication training as a path to launch communication careers that pay better than non-profit organisation and government jobs do. Thus, they may be less idealistic regarding national than their instructors are. As might be observed, the definition of Development Communication has remained in flux and problematic since its inception and is notably abstract with regard to its application to professional journalism. Is actually journalism as most professional practitioners know it, or is it an interventionist arm of government or other forces for development that may or may not have the best interest of the society in mind? …
Language: English
Subfield: Communication
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W36504203
FWCI:
Cites: 32
Cited by:
Related to: 10