Year: 2023
Type: article
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the total radiomics quality score (RQS) and the reproducibility of individual RQS items' score in a large multireader study. METHODS: Nine raters with different backgrounds were randomly assigned to three groups based on their proficiency with RQS utilization: Groups 1 and 2 represented the inter-rater reliability groups with or without prior training in RQS, respectively; group 3 represented the intra-rater reliability group. Thirty-three original research papers on radiomics were evaluated by raters of groups 1 and 2. Of the 33 papers, 17 were evaluated twice with an interval of 1 month by raters of group 3. Intraclass coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables, and Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa (k) statistics for categorical variables were used. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate for total RQS (ICC 0.30-055, p < 0.001) and very low to good for item's reproducibility (k - 0.12 to 0.75) within groups 1 and 2 for both inexperienced and experienced raters. The intra-rater reliability for total RQS was moderate for the less experienced rater (ICC 0.522, p = 0.009), whereas experienced raters showed excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.91-0.99, p < 0.001) between the first and second read. Intra-rater reliability on RQS items' score reproducibility was higher and most of the items had moderate to good intra-rater reliability (k - 0.40 to 1). CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of the total RQS and the score of individual RQS items is low. There is a need for a robust and reproducible assessment method to assess the quality of radiomics research. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: There is a need for reproducible scoring systems to improve quality of radiomics research and consecutively close the translational gap between research and clinical implementation. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics quality score has been widely used for the evaluation of radiomics studies. • Although the intra-rater reliability was moderate to excellent, intra- and inter-rater reliability of total score and point-by-point scores were low with radiomics quality score. • A robust, easy-to-use scoring system is needed for the evaluation of radiomics research.
Source: European Radiology
Authors: Tugba Akinci D’Antonoli, Armando Ugo Cavallo, Federica Vernuccio, Arnaldo Stanzione, Michail E. Klontzas, Roberto Cannella, Lorenzo Ugga, Agah Baran, Salvatore Claudio Fanni, Ekaterina Petrash, Ilaria Ambrosini, Luca Alessandro Cappellini, Peter van Ooijen, Elmar Kotter, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Renato Cuocolo, for the EuSoMII Radiomics Auditing Group
Institutions: Kantonsspital Baselland, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, University of Padua, Azienda Ospedale - Università Padova, University of Naples Federico II, University of Crete, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Palermo, University of Pisa, Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Humanitas University, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Freiburg, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Hospital Cologne, University of Salerno
Language: English
Subfield: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,990
Funder: Universität Basel
OpenAlex ID: W4386910046