Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Several authors have recently argued that knowledge is not the aim of inquiry since it can make sense to inquire into a question even though one knows the answer. I argue that this a faulty diagnostic for determining whether one has met the constitutive standard of success of an activity type. The constitutive standards of success tell us when an activity is successful, but such standards can be exceeded and exceeding them can be reasonable. To back this up I develop an account of zetetic supererogation and argue that subjects who continue to inquire into a question while knowing the answer do what is zetetically supererogatory.
Source: Philosophical Issues
DOI: 10.1111/phis.12262
Author: Jaakko Hirvelä
Institution: University of Helsinki
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,760
Funders: Koneen Säätiö, European Research Council
Award: G7286243678
OpenAlex ID: W4402575019
