Prescribing patterns amongst UK dermatologists for the treatment of alopecia areata, female pattern hair loss, and frontal fibrosing alopecia
Year: 2024
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Background Therapeutic management of hair loss is frequently complicated by a lack of high‐quality evidence and reliant on the use of unlicensed therapies. Treatment decision‐making is predominantly based on expert opinion, local availability, personal experience, and cost, which make informed choices challenging for clinicians and patients in this area. Objectives The aims were to determine prescribing patterns amongst UK Dermatologists with a special interest in hair disorders, when treating mild‐moderate alopecia areata (AA), severe AA (including alopecia totalis/alopecia universalis), female pattern hair loss (FPHL) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA). Methods Consultant members of the British Hair and Nail society, a special interest group affiliated to the British Association of Dermatologists, were invited to participate from across the United Kingdom. Participants were questioned on their current prescribing patterns in both NHS and private practice, were asked to rank their first‐to‐fifth line treatments for each condition and highlight the treatment they perceive as most effective for each disorder. Results Twenty‐six Consultant Dermatologists completed the questionnaire, from twenty‐three institutions. For treatment of mild‐moderate AA, topical corticosteroids were used first line amongst 65% (n = 17) of respondents, and 82% (n = 23) reported that intralesional corticosteroids were the most effective treatment. For severe AA, oral corticosteroids were used first line amongst 38% (n = 10) of respondents, and 25% (n = 8) reported that oral corticosteroids were the most effective treatment. For FPHL, topical minoxidil was used first line amongst 84% (n = 25) of respondents, and 42% (n = 10) reported that oral minoxidil was the most effective treatment. For FFA, topical corticosteroids were used first line amongst 62% (n = 16) of respondents, and 37% (n = 14) reported that hydroxychloroquine was the most effective treatment. Conclusions This study reports real‐world prescribing practices amongst dermatologists treating common hair loss conditions. These results aim to support clinicians with decision making for managing hair loss conditions.
Source: JEADV Clinical Practice
DOI: 10.1002/jvc2.495
Authors: John Frewen, Dalia Alsaadi, Leila Asfour, Sharon Belmo, Alyson Bryden, Caroline Champagne, Nicola Clayton, Nicola Cooke, Donna M. Cummins, David Fairhurst, Paul Farrant, Gordan Hale, Susan Holmes, Thomas Harries, Ruth Jones, Sanja Karanovic, Manjit R. Kaur, Nekma Meah, Megan Mowbray, Archana Rao, Nasim Rouhani, Nicola Salmon, Anita Takwale, Martin Wade, Sharon Wong, Shirin Zaheri, Yusur Al‐Nuaimi, Matthew Harries
Institutions: Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Ninewells Hospital, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford General Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Newcastle University, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Churchill Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St Helens Hospital, Queen Margaret Hospital, Kingston Hospital NHS Trust, Central Middlesex Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London Clinic, Homes England, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Language: English
Topic: Hair Growth and Disorders
Subfield: Dermatology
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,700
Awards: G1483213741, G1798610363
OpenAlex ID: W4403743245
