Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Peer review is a fundamental part of scientific publishing, ensuring the originality and quality of published work. After the peer review process, authors may receive a range of decisions, such as acceptance pending minor or major revisions, which typically require a formal response letter addressed to the reviewers and the editor. While this step can be challenging, it often brings valuable opportunities to improve the manuscript. This article aims to analyze the types of feedback authors may receive from reviewers and to offer strategies for crafting effective responses, ultimately increasing the chances of publication.
Language: Spanish
Subfield: Library and Information Sciences
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4409916629