Top 10 priorities for future ectopic pregnancy research: an international consensus development study
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the future priorities for ectopic pregnancy research. DESIGN: Potential research questions were collated from an initial international survey, a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines, and Cochrane systematic reviews. A rationalized list of confirmed research uncertainties was prioritized in an interim international survey. Prioritized research uncertainties were discussed during a consensus development meeting. Using a formal consensus development method, the modified nominal group technique, diverse stakeholders identified the top 10 research priorities for future ectopic pregnancy research. SUBJECTS: Healthcare professionals, people with lived experience of ectopic pregnancy, and others were brought together in an open and transparent process using formal consensus methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. EXPOSURE: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Top 10 research priorities for ectopic pregnancy. RESULTS: The initial survey was completed by 855 participants from 35 countries, and 1,220 potential research questions were submitted. Three clinical practice guidelines and 43 Cochrane systematic reviews identified a further 24 potential research questions. A rationalized list of 49 confirmed research uncertainties was entered into an interim prioritization survey completed by 413 respondents from 20 countries. The top 10 research priorities were identified during a consensus development meeting involving 37 participants from 10 countries. These research priorities are diverse and seek answers to questions regarding prevention, treatment, and the longer-term impact of ectopic pregnancy. CONCLUSION: We anticipate that the identified research priorities, developed to specifically highlight the most pressing clinical needs as perceived by healthcare professionals, people with lived experience of ectopic pregnancy, and others, will help research funding organizations and researchers to develop their future research agenda.
Source: Fertility and Sterility
Authors: Tara Ajith, Kurt T. Barnhart, Ruth Bender Atik, Tom Bourne, Krystle Chong, George Condous, Pamela I. Causa Andrieu, Grigorios Derdelis, Andrew W. Horne, Judith A.F. Huirne, Davor Jurkovic, Emma Kirk, Ernest H.Y. Ng, Ricardo F. Savaris, Janneke van’t Hooft, Madelon van Wely, Liesl de Waard, Maria P. Velez, Jian Zhang, James M.N. Duffy, Maria Memtsa, Munira Oza, Ben W. Mol
Institutions: Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London, University of Pennsylvania, Miscarriage Association, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, KU Leuven, Monash University, The University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Mayo Clinic, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Mitera Hospital, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Reproduction Development, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, University of Amsterdam, Stellenbosch University, McGill University Health Centre, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Ectopic Pregnancy Trust
Language: English
Subfield: Obstetrics and Gynecology
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $4,220
OpenAlex ID: W4414568461