The Arbitration Seesaw: Federal Act Preempts General Law Thereby Restricting Judicial Review
Year: 2014
Type: article
Abstract: Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg.Co., 388 U.S. 395, 404 n.12 (1967).The Court went on to say that "[t]o immunize an arbitration agreement from judicial challenge on the ground of fraud in the inducement would be to elevate it over other forms of contract-a situation inconsistent with the 'saving clause.'"Id. 2 Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265, 283 (1995) (O'Connor, J., concurring) (citation omitted).3The Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § § 1- 16 (2006).Section 2 allows the courts to determine the enforceability of arbitration agreements "upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract."Id. § 2.
Authors: Tanya M. Marcum, Elizabeth A. Campbell
Institutions: Bradley University, Valparaiso University
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W53940892