Work

Table 2. Recognition of Implicit Contrast by Human Participants. - https://doi.org/10.70594/brain/17.S1/26

Year: 2026

Type: supplementary-materials

Abstract: Only five participants (13%) suggested that the passage contained implicit contrast, whereasthirty-five respondents (87%) failed to identify any underlying opposition (Table 2). Unlike theUkrainian examples, participants frequently reported uncertainty regarding their interpretations andexplicitly acknowledged that they lacked sufficient information to explain the passage. Typicalcomments included "I need more context," "The image seems meaningful, but I cannot determinethe contrast," and "Without knowing the rest of the poem, the intended meaning remains unclear."

Source: Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23885249

Authors: Shytyk, Liudmyla Volodymyrivna, Yuldasheva, Liudmyla Petrivna, Dosenko, Anzhelika Kostiantynivna, Sytnyk, Oleksii Valeriiovych, Malysh, Myroslava Mykhailivna, Halych, Artem Oleksandrovych

Institutions: Cherkasy National University, Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, University of Luhansk

Language: English

Topic: Language, Metaphor, and Cognition

Subfield: Linguistics and Language

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: green

OpenAlex ID: W7225101830

Cites:

Cited by:

Related to: 10