Year: 2007
Type: article
Abstract: This study compared the relative utility of an intelligent tutoring system that uses procedure-based hints to a version that uses worked-out examples. The system, Andes, taught college level physics. In order to test which strategy produced better gains in competence, two versions of Andes were used: one offered participants graded hints and the other offered annotated, worked-out examples in response to their help requests. We found that providing examples was at least as effective as the hintsequences and was more efficient in terms of the number of problems it took to obtain the same level of mastery.
Author: Michael Ringenberg
Language: English
Subfield: Artificial Intelligence
Field: Computer Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: green
Funder: National Science Foundation
OpenAlex ID: W1576126524
